Thread: Google buy YouTube for $1.65 billion (Confirmed) |
|

October 9th, 2006, 05:56 PM
|
|
Merchant & ABW Ambassador
Join Date: May 31st, 2006
Location: Houston TX
Posts: 4,715
|
|
Guess it deserve its own thread
From ABC News
GOOGLE SAYS IT WILL BUY THE VIDEO-SHARING WEB SITE YOUTUBE FOR $1.65 BILLION IN STOCK; YOUTUBE HAS NEVER MADE A CENT
CNN article
Speculation of G buy YouTube thread.
http://forum.abestweb.com/showthread.php?t=79850
|

October 10th, 2006, 09:10 AM
|
|
Shimmy Shimmy Bang Bang
Join Date: January 18th, 2005
Posts: 299
|
|
I can't believe Google Stock is going up, I would be selling it right now. I can't stand companies like YouTube that are full of copyright infringement content that say it's not their fault, they didn't upload it.
|

October 10th, 2006, 10:25 AM
|
|
GiftShoppingZone AM
Join Date: September 10th, 2006
Posts: 114
|
|
obviously, google has figured out a way by which they can turn youtube into a cash cow?
__________________
Join The Giftshoppingzone.com Affiliate Program on SAS - 10% on sales , Unlimited cookie, over 15,000 products in datafeed!
Gift Ideas
|

October 10th, 2006, 10:38 AM
|
|
Super Sh!t Stirrer
Join Date: January 18th, 2005
Posts: 9,949
|
|
YouTube users could share in ad revenues
Best buy a camera!
I gunna be a GooTube star!
__________________
Comments are opinion unless otherwise noted. Remember, pillage first. Then burn. Half of all people in the world have IQs under 100. You best learn to trust ol' SSanf!
|

October 10th, 2006, 06:15 PM
|
|
ABW Ambassador
Join Date: January 18th, 2005
Location: Nunya, Business
Posts: 23,611
|
|
Founders of YouTube, can't keep the smile off their faces  Must feel good
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QCVxQ_3Ejkg
|

October 10th, 2006, 07:00 PM
|
|
Prince of Content
Join Date: January 18th, 2005
Posts: 3,132
|
|
if google just put two adsense ads next to each site for video cameras it would make that money back in no time. I would be buying google stock right now
|

October 11th, 2006, 01:37 AM
|
|
ABW Ambassador
Join Date: January 18th, 2005
Posts: 4,432
|
|
Google promised myspace $900 million for a 3 years 9 month contract with adsense.
How does this not make sense?
Chet
|

October 11th, 2006, 02:24 AM
|
|
Member
Join Date: October 27th, 2005
Posts: 349
|
|
Yeah but all this blatant copyright violation stuff will have to come to a head at some point.
|

October 11th, 2006, 02:59 AM
|
|
Resident Genius and Staunch Capitalist
Join Date: January 18th, 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 12,826
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by chetf
Google promised myspace $900 million for a 3 years 9 month contract with adsense.
How does this not make sense?
Chet
|
Edited--
If you meant YouTube rather than myspace, since G bought YT, it doesn't make any obvious sense for Google to basically "pay" part of itself $900 million for showing its own ads--it's just some kind of accounting BS. But I see companies claiming to pay their other divisions quite often, so there must be some (probably IRS-related) reason they bother with such shell games...
If you really did mean MySpace:
It doesn't make sense because in 3 years and 9 months, something else may have come along and bumped myspace from its seat--so they may end up with no (or substantially lower than predicted) clicks long before that time is up.
Kind of like how some ball clubs will hire a multimillion-dollar pitcher for a several-year contract, only to see him wreck his arm in the first season and end up paying him to warm the bench from then on (if they don't find a way to terminate the contract early).
It's a gamble. It may pay off--but it very well may not.
It'd be very poetic justice for Google to not be able to get traffic to a site that they've covered in ads
Last edited by Leader; October 11th, 2006 at 04:24 AM.
|

October 11th, 2006, 04:44 AM
|
|
ABW Ambassador
Join Date: January 18th, 2005
Posts: 4,432
|
|
Leader, google promised myspace 900 million over roughly 4 years. So figure that they split the revenue with them the same or better rates than the regular split. That means if they owned myspace, they could pocket the 1.8 billion they are guessing on. Since they are willing to do that, why not just buy the property, keep it all to yourself and maybe even expand it as you promote it and learn how to do the social thing?
youtube just seems like a no-brainer after the myspace deal.
Chet
|

October 11th, 2006, 07:14 AM
|
|
Resident Genius and Staunch Capitalist
Join Date: January 18th, 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 12,826
|
|
Considering that, it'd be logical IF it all works out as planned.
But that's a big IF. Kind of like betting ~$1 billion on the weather.
Sure you can guess it'll snow in MI in January, but betting how much snow on just what day is a whole different proposition.
They could both be no-brainers all right, as in, Google might have used no brains
|

October 11th, 2006, 12:25 PM
|
|
ABW Ambassador
Join Date: January 18th, 2005
Location: Nunya, Business
Posts: 23,611
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by dsteitz
Yeah but all this blatant copyright violation stuff will have to come to a head at some point.
|
On Monday:
YouTube Signs Three Content Deals
http://www.betanews.com/article/YouT...als/1160413732
They'll just do that, sign licensing deals. It would make sense for companies to do that, work with Google, not against. Everybody makes money. I'm sure they thought about all of thought before going thru with the deal, they have a gang of lawyers.
|
 |

Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|