Welcome, guest! Login
Close

Login to Your Account


  |  » Forgot your password?
Join

Thread: Multi-Network Tracking Solutions - conditional representation"

 
Tools Search
  #1  
Old October 17th, 2011, 09:41 PM
Join Date: April 5th, 2005
Location: Park City Utah
Posts: 15,033
Send a message via AIM to Chuck Hamrick Send a message via MSN to Chuck Hamrick Send a message via Yahoo to Chuck Hamrick Send a message via Skype™ to Chuck Hamrick
Multi-Network Tracking Solutions - conditional representation"

Wanted to discuss this specific to Shareasale's policy as there seems to be some confusion in previous threads. There is a technique that I have used with several merchants for years:

Its called "conditional representation". You set a first party cookie based on the referring URL being an affiliate link. Then you only fire the appropriate pixel. You want to avoid running dual pixels on a Thank You page.

Am bringing this up so Brian can respond if it conflicts with the SAS policy.
  #2  
Old October 18th, 2011, 09:58 AM
<b>Affiliate Manager<b>
Join Date: May 23rd, 2005
Location: Collins, MS
Posts: 108
Send a message via MSN to dculpepper Send a message via Yahoo to dculpepper
As it was explained to me... conditionally displaying the SAS tacking pixel is NOT allowed. The SAS pixel must be displayed after every sale and then any duplicate transactions voided after the fact.
__________________
David Culpepper, SubscriptionAgent.com
Affiliate Program Info | E: david@subscriptionagent.com | Twitter | Facebook
30% Commission & LIFETIME Cookie!
Thanks From:
  #3  
Old October 18th, 2011, 12:59 PM
ShareASale President/CEO and ABW Veteran
Join Date: January 18th, 2005
Posts: 3,564
Hey Chuck, thanks for the opportunity to explain - sorry I meant to do this last night when you posted but had left the office right about that time.

We do require the ShareASale tracking pixel to be displayed at all times. We do, however, allow a commission to be auto-voided if the Merchant determines that their Affiliate on ShareASale should not receive commission due to a later click from an Affiliate on another Network.

The reasons are twofold: 1) To make sure that an Affiliate on ShareASale has transparency into the whole scope of a Merchant program and 2) So that a Merchant can better see how traffic and clicks relate between multiple networks.

This was not as much of a problem years ago, but has become much more prevalent as it is common for Merchants to not only have 2 Network relationships, but sometimes 3, 4 and even 7 or more.


Often, I am told that "last click" is just accepted as normal - and Affiliates are used to having their clicks trumped... This is true in a one Network scenario, where every Affiliate is forced to play by the same rulebook.

However, when introducing multiple Networks - there are now multiple rulebooks to play by - and we believe that an Affiliate on ShareASale has the right to information that could affect whether or not they wish to partner with a certain Merchant.

This is not a judgment on any other Network - this is simply a recognition that all Networks do things differently ... and that we cannot control the actions of each other. Even if there were an Affiliate that was violating the Terms of every single Network - ShareASale would still not be able to take action against that Affiliate's account on any network other than their own.

Our second best option was to make sure that the information was available to everyone to at least alert that there may be a problem.



Take an example scenario:
  • Consumer clicks on a ShareASale Affiliate's link
  • Upon going to the Merchant site, the consumer receives a popup or toolbar dropdown of a coupon. (This would be against ShareASale Terms of Service, but is commonly acceptable at many other Networks)
  • Consumer is thus redirected through another Network and that Affiliate will receive commission.


If we did not require our pixel to be displayed, a ShareASale Affiliate would have no idea that any of this occurred and would simply think that their traffic was not converting.

With our policy in place, they are aware of the situation and can determine if the level of voids is acceptable, or indicates a problem.

When we do require the pixel to be displayed, while the commission is auto-voided as "Multi Network", the Affiliate can see and has transparency enough to be able to recognize potential problems. At the same time, a Merchant can now see which transactions may be red-flags, and which as just standard "last click".


Bottom line, we feel it is a policy that adds to more transparency. We are tweaking how it is represented so that it is more clear - as we've received word that Affiliates have been confused by some of the voids. We'll work on that to make sure the information is clear - but we feel the policy has already been a great help in recognizing problems that would have gone unmasked and unnoticed otherwise.
__________________
Thanks,

Brian Littleton
President/CEO - ShareASale.com, Inc.
Join ABW to remove this sponsored message.
  #4  
Old October 21st, 2011, 04:38 PM
Newbie
Join Date: October 21st, 2011
Posts: 8
I have been having issues with this. I have an account with Share-A-Sale and CJ and affiliates have been getting upset due to me manually tracking the sales. what would you suggest be the best way to make them happy again.
  #5  
Old October 21st, 2011, 07:44 PM
Join Date: April 5th, 2005
Location: Park City Utah
Posts: 15,033
Send a message via AIM to Chuck Hamrick Send a message via MSN to Chuck Hamrick Send a message via Yahoo to Chuck Hamrick Send a message via Skype™ to Chuck Hamrick
Brian, wanted to let others respond as I see a concern on the forum that relates to this. Seems that affiliates are complaining about high reversals such as here: http://www.abestweb.com/forums/commi...ns-147394.html

The easy solution is for the Affiliate Manager to limit the affiliate to only one network. Otherwise they are just creating additional work for themselves and hard feelings with the affiliates.

style="margin:20px; margin-top:5px; ">
Quote:
The reasons are twofold: 1) To make sure that an Affiliate on ShareASale has transparency into the whole scope of a Merchant program and 2) So that a Merchant can better see how traffic and clicks relate between multiple networks.
I like your thinking here. So how does an affiliate or merchant see this in the interface?
  #6  
Old October 22nd, 2011, 01:08 PM
Fighting the good fight...
Join Date: June 24th, 2005
Location: Brighton, CO USA
Posts: 5,830
Send a message via AIM to Convergence
style="margin:20px; margin-top:5px; ">
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chuck Hamrick View Post
So how does an affiliate or merchant see this in the interface?
My understanding is merchants are return days (cookie length) are set to zero.

http://www.abestweb.com/forums/share...cy-146003.html
__________________
Merchants - please switch from Commission Junction to another network. CJ is no longer functional.
AffiliateWorx | Researching a New Affiliate Network Co-Op
Merchants - want our recommendation for an OPM - send a PM
Join ABW to remove this sponsored message.
Reply
 

Tools Search
Search:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Multi-attribution Conversion Tracking Tool? TaylorBarr Affiliate Marketing Tracking Software and Networks 1 April 26th, 2013 12:04 PM
Clarification on the Multi-Network Policy Convergence ShareASale - SAS 29 July 26th, 2011 02:30 PM
Affiliate Phone Tracking Solutions Michael Nunez AffiliateManager.com 19 January 27th, 2008 04:13 PM

X

Welcome to ABestWeb.com

Create your username to jump into the discussion!

ABestWeb.com is the largest affiliate marketing community on the Internet. Join us by filling in the form below.


(4 digit year)

Already a member?



Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.