Results 1 to 3 of 3
  1. #1
    Analytics Dude Kevin's Avatar
    Join Date
    January 18th, 2005
    Location
    Rochester, NY
    Posts
    5,904
    The Snowball Effect
    While it's not 100% that this legislation will pass, nor has it been put in front of any "affiliate friendly" attorneys such as the NY legislation was, I need to point out here that this CA legislation, and all that will follow, were the reasons I screamed bloody murder whenever it was hinted at that the NY legislation was "not that big a deal".

    Each sub-sequent state will write it tighter and "better", pushing the limits of what the last state got away with.

    As I stated very early yesterday morning, my suspicion is that the INTENT of this legislation is to include Google advertising as well. Whether or not it's written well enough to do that remains to be seen. That would destroy affiliates in CA beyond repair.

    Others have pointed out that OPMs and affiliate networks themselves may be in the cross hairs as well. My original read didn't include that thought, but I suppose it's very possible.

    So once again, I ask the affiliate community... the WHOLE community... to stand up and take action. This is bigger than toolbars, and bigger than cookie crumbling (not to belittle those important issues...).

    It's cookie preventing, and it needs to stop.
    Kevin Webster
    twitter: levelanalytics

    Kayak Fishing
    Web Analytics and Affiliate Marketing

  2. #2
    Advocate mellie's Avatar
    Join Date
    January 18th, 2005
    Location
    Here
    Posts
    1,925
    Excellent post Kevin.

    You're right it will snowball. If you listen to proposed legislation or talk about proposing legislation they all seek to close the openings left by earlier legislation.
    Melanie
    President - Affiliate Advocacy 2008 ShareaSale Performance Industry Advocate Award, 2009 Affiliate Summit Pinnacle Award - Affiliate Advocate
    Affiliate Advocacy
    NYAffiliateVoice Seery Writing

  3. #3
    Analytics Dude Kevin's Avatar
    Join Date
    January 18th, 2005
    Location
    Rochester, NY
    Posts
    5,904
    A further clarification on my Google


    • Google has plenty of offices in CA.
    • Google receives "other considerations" for driving buying traffic (i.e. "selling", as we use the term) to merchants outside of California to residents IN California.
    Therefore, we might conclude that any merchant running AdWords campaigns ON THE SEARCH NETWORK into California could potentially be liable for collecting the tax.

    That's how broad and dangerous I read this one to be.


    I look forward to seeing some legal brains have at this one.
    Last edited by Kevin; February 27th, 2009 at 10:45 AM. Reason: further clarification
    Kevin Webster
    twitter: levelanalytics

    Kayak Fishing
    Web Analytics and Affiliate Marketing

  4. Newsletter Signup

+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. Negative Effect
    By fiberglass in forum Programming / Datafeeds / Tools
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: June 7th, 2010, 06:48 AM
  2. Adwords Changes Still Not In Effect?
    By Cheesehead in forum Midnight Cafe'
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: January 13th, 2005, 08:28 PM
  3. Most effect Ad campaign ever!!!
    By ecomcity in forum Building Traffic, Newsletters & Advertising
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: July 25th, 2003, 10:19 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •