View Poll Results: Which Datafeed Transport Method You Think is Better, and Why?
- 6. You may not vote on this poll
More Than One
July 11th, 2009, 07:06 PM #1Which Datafeed Transport Method You Think is Better, and Why?
Before CJ made this announcement last May: Manage your own product feeds, I was using the CJ FTP option...
And even though I didn't liked that method that much because of the way I was getting the feeds with the date on the file name, I was getting use to it...
Last month I started using the email option with just two feeds, and I really not too excited with getting more than one email update, per feed, per day...
This morning I was about to switch to the Client FTP option, but I thought that if I use the CJ FTP option instead, that then I would be able to control when and how often I set up my cron-job to do the datafeeds update...
So, now than I am thinking of getting many more product feed subscriptions, I would like to ask for a second opinion of: Which Datafeed Transport Method You Think is Better, and Why?
Btw, you can vote for more than one on that private poll...
July 11th, 2009, 08:15 PM #2
- Join Date
- February 28th, 2005
direct http download xml/csv zipped ... and because thats the way i like it huh!
July 11th, 2009, 09:22 PM #3
I like CJ_FTP. Never tried email. I'm not sure what Client_FTP is unless it's like when GAN sends via ftp to my server. Both of those work fine for me and I use CRON to pull from either my own server for GAN or CJ's server in that case. I'm probably not seeing the problem since I've never tried the Client_FTP option.
By nobugs in forum Midnight Cafe'Replies: 25Last Post: January 7th, 2009, 03:13 PM