Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1
    Super Dawg Member Phil Kaufman aka AffiliateHound's Avatar
    Join Date
    January 22nd, 2007
    Location
    West Covina, CA
    Posts
    8,443
    FCC expected to pass net neutrality rule
    from the Washington Post:

    "The Federal Communications Commission is poised on Tuesday to pass so-called net neutrality regulations, first-time rules that prevent Internet service providers from blocking or giving preferential treatment to Web sites on their networks.

    "...

    "The rules would prevent Internet service providers from blocking Web sites and applications on Internet lines feeding into American homes. Those carriers -- such as Comcast and AT&T could not deliberately slow down one Web site over another. The rules frown on the practice of charging Web sites for better or faster delivery, but observers say that practice is not strictly prohibited in the order."
    The "rule" may raise as many questions as it answers.

    The article.
    Since June 10, 2012 a vegan aarf but still writing the Hound Dawg Sports Blog
    "If you don't have time to do it right, when will you have time to do it over?" -John Wooden;
    "Raj, there’s no place for truth on the internet." -Howard Wolowitz[/SIZE]

  2. #2
    OPM and Moderator Chuck Hamrick's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 5th, 2005
    Location
    Park City Utah
    Posts
    16,646
    It sounds like an advertising model to me. If YouTube and Google pay more to get more bandwidth then smaller sites get slowed down. It could hurt the small site owner like an affiliate where page load latency is so high that the page gets ignored.

    Not to derail this thread but here is another concern about Internet Governance (can be split into another discussion): U.N. Delegates Debate Control Of Internet

  3. #3
    Super Dawg Member Phil Kaufman aka AffiliateHound's Avatar
    Join Date
    January 22nd, 2007
    Location
    West Covina, CA
    Posts
    8,443
    The FCC passed these new rules today, amid criticism from all sides. Today's Washington Post article - excerpts:

    "The Federal Communications Commission voted Tuesday to approve its first ever Internet access regulation, which ensures unimpeded access to any legal Web content for home Internet users.

    "The same provisions do not apply as strongly to cellphone users because the agency voted to keep wireless networks generally free of rules preventing the blocking and slowing of Web traffic.

    "...

    "The rules have sparked intense debate and lobbying over whether such legislation is needed, and are likely to face a legal challenge. [FCC Chairman] Genachowski has argued that Internet access rules would protect companies just starting out on the Web, as well as consumers who are increasingly relying on the Internet for news, entertainment and communications.

    The agency's two Republican members voted against the rules, showing support for Internet service providers who say the regulation will impede their ability to create new business plans that expand their roles over the Internet economy.

    "...

    "The net neutrality measure is the federal government's first move to regulate broadband access. Questions remain, however, over whether the agency has the legal right to serve as the nation's watchdog over Internet access. Last spring, a federal appeals court said the FCC overstepped its authority by sanctioning Comcast for blocking access to users of BitTorrent's peer-to-peer sharing application.

    The rules are sure to face a court challenge and have prompted opposition from Republican lawmakers, who plan to tackle the regulation through Congressional action.

    Rep. Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.) said she will reintroduce legislation to overthrow the rules. Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison (R-Tex.) said she will move to withdraw funds appropriated to the FCC to execute the rules.

    "The FCC is attempting to push excessive government regulation of the Internet through without Congressional authority, and these actions threaten the very future of the technology," said Hutchison, the ranking GOP member of the Energy and Commerce Committee.

    "And on the other side, consumer groups aren't happy, either. Public interest groups have said they will consider filing suit against the rules that they fought to enact, asserting that the regulation doesn't go far enough to protect consumers.

    "...

    "To be clear, we do not anchor ourselves on what I believe to be the best legal framework," [FCC Member] Copps said. 'Nor have we crafted rules as strong as I would have liked. But, with today’s action, we do nonetheless appear to steer ourselves back toward a better course.'"
    The rules are a start, but the money and political power of AT&T, Comcast, Time-Warner, etc. will likely be able to overcome issues of fairness and consumer rights, that can only result in future obstacles that will make it more difficult for the little guy on the web to compete. Not impossible as the doomsayers will continue to say, but difficult and expensive.
    Since June 10, 2012 a vegan aarf but still writing the Hound Dawg Sports Blog
    "If you don't have time to do it right, when will you have time to do it over?" -John Wooden;
    "Raj, there’s no place for truth on the internet." -Howard Wolowitz[/SIZE]

  4. #4
    Super Dawg Member Phil Kaufman aka AffiliateHound's Avatar
    Join Date
    January 22nd, 2007
    Location
    West Covina, CA
    Posts
    8,443
    Sens. Maria Cantwell (D-WA) and Sen. Al Franken (D-MN) have introduced the "Internet Freedom, Broadband Promotion, and Consumer Protection Act of 2011" to extend net neutrality to all forms of Internet access (including wireless). From "Senators bash "telecom oligarchs," propose strict net neutrality bill":

    "In the month since the FCC adopted its open Internet rules, most of the DC debate over net neutrality has focused on FCC overreach. Verizon sued the agency. MetroPCS sued the agency. Rep. Marsha Blackburn (R-TN) introduced a bill to strip the FCC of any authority to regulate Internet access.

    "...

    "'The recent FCC ruling on net neutrality does not do nearly enough to protect consumers, and this bill is designed to maintain a free and open Internet,' Franken said in a statement when the bill was released. Last week, Franken made a speech in which he called net neutrality the 'free speech issue of our time' and said that the FCC rules 'will create essentially two Internets.'"
    Everyone in affiliate marketing needs to support this bill (unless you are TimeWarner or Comcast, etc.)

    Write, call, email your Senators!
    Since June 10, 2012 a vegan aarf but still writing the Hound Dawg Sports Blog
    "If you don't have time to do it right, when will you have time to do it over?" -John Wooden;
    "Raj, there’s no place for truth on the internet." -Howard Wolowitz[/SIZE]

  5. Newsletter Signup

+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. Net Neutrality is Anything But Neutral
    By Chad-AvantLink in forum Midnight Cafe'
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: December 28th, 2010, 06:40 PM
  2. FCC loses on Internet neutrality
    By Georgie Peri in forum Midnight Cafe'
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: April 7th, 2010, 08:14 PM
  3. Cheaper and Faster Net access - FCC
    By Eric Ewe in forum Midnight Cafe'
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: March 15th, 2010, 01:41 PM
  4. Net neutrality debate
    By Merchant Consultant Team in forum Midnight Cafe'
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: August 12th, 2008, 08:05 PM
  5. Net neutrality / The Net Ends in 2012
    By ProWebAddict in forum Virtual Family and Off-Topic
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: June 4th, 2008, 10:15 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •