Results 1 to 4 of 4
August 16th, 2011, 10:35 AM #1Do "place holder" websites help age the domain?
superCool has heard tidbits here and there about putting up "placeholder" sites on new domains that have not been developed yet. Do you do this and do you think it helps? How much content do you put on the placeholder? Do you add any aff links or do you wait until you're ready to develop?
superCool has tried this with two domains...
1) put up not much more than a list of the keywords he's hoping to eventually rank for and a few images. no aff links but 1 block of adsense. site is still sitting there waiting to be developed and gets very little traffic (not really expecting any either)
2) had a decent domain name and decided to put up a very basic datafeed site with a few feeds. made the site look nice, but didn't optimize or do anything special. site has normal datafeed aff links. this site turned out to do pretty well without messing with it. getting sales and good rankings on some pages without optimizing at all. what started out as a placeholder is now a producing site, but it still needs to be fully developed.
What experiences have you had with this? Or advice
August 16th, 2011, 10:53 AM #2
Why? One of the known ranking factors is "how long a domain name has been a certain type of site".
Perhaps Danny Sullivan's The Periodic Table Of SEO Ranking Factors can explain my thoughts more clearly.
It's described as "Trust" (history) = Th
"Has site or its domain been around a long time, operating in same way?"
I would stay away from your example #1 - basically a parked page. Example #2 could morph into a related site, just improved upon and should be OK.Salty kisses, Sandy toes, and a Pirate's heart...
August 16th, 2011, 01:21 PM #3
yes site #1 was a newbie attempt at aging a domain. the "content" is relevant but not in a useful form. probably not doing anything positive but hopefully not a negative for the domain's future.
site #2 was a quick attempt to start the site aging with feed content without putting in all the work to finish the site out. seems to have worked pretty well but not sure in the long run
what superCool is considering now is putting up a vanilla site with one or two pages of decent unique content about the topic. maybe a few outlinks to authority sites. that might actually be considered a mini site, but superCool is thinking of it more as a way to get things going before developing the domain. just hate having domains sitting around with nothing on them and not doing anything at all. seems like putting in a couple hours of effort per domain might be worth it. the domains are certainly not getting anywhere sitting in my domain bucket.
will see what happens, but it will probably be difficult to quantify any results
August 16th, 2011, 06:33 PM #4
If you have the skills why wouldn't you do your example #2 until you can circle back and fully develop the site?
By Rhia7 in forum Newbie Affiliate FAQs & Helpful ArticlesReplies: 2Last Post: June 11th, 2010, 01:06 PM
By cognitivefun in forum ShareASale - SASReplies: 4Last Post: September 4th, 2006, 03:40 PM
By Chocolate_Chicken in forum GoldenCANReplies: 2Last Post: July 29th, 2005, 12:51 PM
By Andy in forum Search Engine OptimizationReplies: 23Last Post: August 6th, 2002, 09:18 AM