Results 1 to 5 of 5
June 17th, 2015, 09:31 PM #1Site Relevance
Why are some Affiliate Managers so bothered about site 'relevance'?
Yesterday I applied to three merchants on the same network.
Two of them accepted me.
The third sent me a very courteous e-mail saying he couldn't accept me at the moment because he couldn't find that I had a website relevant to his market. He had taken the trouble to look at my list of websites and had found one that was relevant, but the site was no longer active.
This is true.
Fact is, you can't remove expired/inactive websites without jumping through more hoops than I want to. You can't do it yourself. You have to submit a support ticket. We are all pushed for time. My time is better spent building websites than managing my list of sites registered with a network.
If he had accepted me, I would have registered a domain or subdomain and built a datafeed-driven site dedicated to his merchant.
What am I going to do? Spend time explaining my strategy to him or get on with building sites for the merchants who accepted me?
And - what is the big deal about relevance anyway?
If I put a link to a blue widget merchant on a red-widget-themed site, and it results in a click-through and sale - a sale is a sale, right? What does the merchant care if the sale originated on a 'non-relevant' website?
June 18th, 2015, 02:54 PM #2
June 18th, 2015, 03:07 PM #3
- Join Date
- February 8th, 2008
- London, UK. Innit!
There are a few times I have had to build half a site just to get approved by a merchant I want to work with and am I willing to do that.
You were going to build the site anyway, right?
June 18th, 2015, 03:10 PM #4
June 18th, 2015, 03:12 PM #5
By Trust in forum Search Engine OptimizationReplies: 6Last Post: July 7th, 2006, 02:16 PM
By tod1016 in forum Search Engine OptimizationReplies: 21Last Post: March 3rd, 2005, 09:39 AM
By Buddha in forum Midnight Cafe'Replies: 4Last Post: December 8th, 2003, 02:13 PM