Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1
    ABW Ambassador Steveinid's Avatar
    Join Date
    January 18th, 2005
    Posts
    827
    Got a quick question... Don't think it is a SE question but this forum seems close enough.

    My webalizer stats tell me I have (for example) 100 visits to my site but my AWstats tell me I have only 50 visits. Which is more correct?

    Thanks for the insight.

    Steve

    "Bueller...? Bueller...?"

  2. #2
    Full Member ronwls's Avatar
    Join Date
    January 18th, 2005
    Location
    the Real Northern California
    Posts
    340
    Do you have the AWstats code on all your pages?

    I don't know the key to success, but the key to failure is trying to please everybody. - Bill Cosby

  3. #3
    ABW Ambassador Andy's Avatar
    Join Date
    January 18th, 2005
    Posts
    4,178
    AWStats is tracked through the server, no code on individual pages.

    I've also noticed big discrepancies between what Analog, Webalizer, and AWStats report. Quite often, they are worlds apart on their reporting. I don't know which one to believe.

    Based on ad impressions, previous tracking, etc., I use AWStats because it seems to be the most reliable, and the most logical choice. I've never been able to get a good answer for why the numbers are so far off between the various reports, though.

    If anyone knows, they'll be here at ABW...

    Andy

    _______________
    "If you were born to be shot, you'll never be hung." -Unknown

  4. #4
    ABW Ambassador
    Join Date
    January 18th, 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    1,797
    The reason for the disparities between various stats packages is usually down to two things. One is whether they count spiders and bots as 'visitors' or not. Ideally, you want to be using one that separates real visitors from spiders/bots as much as possible.

    Also each stats package has a slightly differing definition of 'unique visitor' based on session times and IP. The idea of a unique visitor is a nebulous one. Stats packages make assumptions about the point at which a visitor becomes another 'unique visitor'. IE: They set a cut off limit (often at 30 minutes) after which time the stats package will record that IP as a new visitor. That's why you get different results from different stats packages.

    WebAlizer is, however, dreadful at everything and not to be trusted. If you have small enough log files, download a day's worth and make a comparison between your own assessment and what WebAlizer is coming up with. You'll never use it again.

    Search Engine Positioning - 1 Design 4 Life

  5. Newsletter Signup

+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. Awstats and WP-Admin
    By suzie250 in forum Programming / Datafeeds / Tools
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: September 24th, 2009, 12:47 AM
  2. Webalizer Stats - Question
    By ~Michelle in forum Midnight Cafe'
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: March 23rd, 2004, 08:37 AM
  3. Webalizer Version 2.01 is it accurate?
    By jc101 in forum Virtual Family and Off-Topic
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: October 7th, 2003, 07:10 PM
  4. AWSTATS install help
    By ken in forum Programming / Datafeeds / Tools
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: September 16th, 2002, 09:31 PM
  5. strange webalizer stats
    By missdonna in forum Midnight Cafe'
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: March 3rd, 2002, 05:11 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •