Results 1 to 4 of 4
July 21st, 2005, 11:39 AM #1When a Merchant's Affs send out SPAM...
The merchant gets burned:
July 21st, 2005, 11:39 AM #2
"The FTC said the seven companies did not send e-mails directly to consumers but operated affiliate programs, paying others to send unwanted messages to drive Internet traffic to adult Web sites. The FTC said under the "Can Spam" law, defendants in such cases are liable because they paid others to send e-mails on their behalf."
July 21st, 2005, 11:52 AM #3
- Join Date
- January 18th, 2005
I saw that and wondered if they paid the affiliates to send the e-mail or if the affiliates were paid commissions on sales resulting from the e-mail.
July 21st, 2005, 01:30 PM #4
Doesn't matter. Either way they gave someone cash money to sapm.Comments are opinion unless otherwise noted. Remember, pillage first. Then burn. Half of all people in the world have IQs under 100. You best learn to trust ol' SSanf!
By Kellie aka Ms. B in forum ShareASale - SASReplies: 9Last Post: July 29th, 2010, 06:26 PM
By Lectrickitty in forum Midnight Cafe'Replies: 7Last Post: January 17th, 2006, 09:31 PM
By bob95603 in forum Midnight Cafe'Replies: 6Last Post: February 3rd, 2005, 09:09 PM
By Roland in forum Midnight Cafe'Replies: 6Last Post: January 26th, 2004, 12:09 PM
By bitwise in forum SpamReplies: 4Last Post: April 14th, 2003, 04:29 PM