Results 1 to 14 of 14
  1. #1
    The slot machine that IS paid! Billy Kay's Avatar
    Join Date
    January 18th, 2005
    Small Town in Tennessee
    Can Merchants Do This?
    One of my merchants has dozens of "Doorway Domains"

    One-page domain sites that are of course keyword heavy for rankings

    And all the links go back to their real merchant site - except they're using their own affiliate link

    Basically, they're competing with their own affiliates

    Is this allowed?

  2. #2
    Affiliate Manager Alan Hamilton's Avatar
    Join Date
    March 13th, 2006
    Colorado / Florida
    Doesn't sound like a very wise / ethical business practice if they care about having affiliates.
    Join the Spicy Aprons Affiliate program on ShareASale Visit us on Facebook Follow us on Twitter @Spicyaprons

  3. #3
    Affiliate Manager
    Join Date
    January 18th, 2005
    I don't see anything wrong with multiple sites as long as they are unique in content. That's just marketing... But using the same links as your affiliates is a different story. There are other ways to track your inhouse sales instead of using the same tracking your affiliates use.

  4. #4
    Affiliate Manager Howard Gottlieb's Avatar
    Join Date
    December 30th, 2006
    Mansfield, Texas
    I wonder why they don't just track the traffic origination points?

    What's the benefit of using affiliate links? Unless the only tracking info they get is through the network they use. If that's the case then they are not terribly sophisticated.
    I would rather live my life as if there is a God and die
    to find out there isn't, than live my life as if there
    isn't and die to find out there is.

  5. #5
    Merchant & ABW Ambassador
    Join Date
    May 31st, 2006
    Houston TX
    Quote Originally Posted by Billy Kay
    One of my merchants has dozens of "Doorway Domains"

    And all the links go back to their real merchant site - except they're using their own affiliate link
    Why do they want to use their own affiliate link? I know most network will charge for tracking or sales.

    It will crowd the SEO space. I don't think this is wrong for a merchant.

    I.e. take ABC-Z merchant in travel with domain They decide to come up with a different site travelideas dot com and pack it KW.

    If they do a redirect, that is a diff question all together.

  6. #6
    Member lookingfortips's Avatar
    Join Date
    September 13th, 2007
    I can see the point if it's a small business with more than one owner. For instance, one partner is too cheap to advertise so the other partner advertises for them at their own expense and signs up as an affiliate in order to earn a commission for the sales they generate as well as their profit share or salary. Other than that, it could be to boost their EPC. Seems pretty pointless though if it is a one-owner company when they have to pay network fees for the sale.

  7. #7
    ABW Ambassador sjangro's Avatar
    Join Date
    January 17th, 2005
    If they set the commissions to zero for that account, they probably won't have to pay anything.

    They probably see it as an easy tracking solution that they don't have another way to do. Chances are, they didn't make the connection that they're competing with their affiliates and potentially clobbering return-days.

  8. #8
    Moderator MichaelColey's Avatar
    Join Date
    January 18th, 2005
    Mansfield, TX
    Definitely a bad practice, but I don't think any network prohibits it. Same with overwriting affiliate cookies when consumers click through their newsletter.

  9. #9
    Outsourced Program Manager Angel Djambazov's Avatar
    Join Date
    November 8th, 2005
    Hey Billy,

    I don't know who the merchant is that you are referring to but it doorway page technique is a very common practice. What's sad/funny is that several super affiliates sell this type of doorway service to merchants creating such pages specifically to impact search.
    Angel Djambazov
    Managing Edtior ReveNews
    OPM for Keen Shoes and

  10. #10
    AM Navigator Geno Prussakov's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 10th, 2005
    Washington D.C. Metro Area
    Quote Originally Posted by Angel Djambazov
    ...What's sad/funny is that several super affiliates sell this type of doorway service to merchants creating such pages specifically to impact search.
    Wow. So it may not even be the merchant coding "their links" through affiliate URLs, but those affiliates that sell the "doorway service" to merchants?


  11. #11
    Join Date
    January 17th, 2005
    Zanesville, OH
    I've actually heard of employees in the merchant that are in cahoots with the affiliate manager and well, they take advantage of the system. I won't name names but it was not too long ago this happened. If you are working with the "gatekeeper"...

  12. #12
    Join Date
    January 18th, 2005
    I don't see this (a merchant's "doorway domains" using affiliate links when sending traffic to the merchant) setting cookies) as a concern.

    I would see it as a problem if the merchant had "coordinating sites" (for example, if also operated and, which are linked from the site, then I think it would be improper for the merchant to have its own affiliate links on those sites).

    I'd also be cautious when assuming that it's really the merchant's "own" affiliate ID.

    The "reluctant partner" situation is certainly realistic.

    Another scenario is that the merchant may be "leasing" the domain from someone and either agreed to pay based on sales, or may use the affiliate-commission stream to pay for the expense of leasing or buying the domain. I once sold a domain on those terms (I would be paid 25% of all revenue driven by the domain for the following 3 years -- which netted me about $10,000).

    Or perhaps the company has refused to authorize time or expenses for a strategy, and a consultant or employee has decided to do it "on their own dime and time," in exchange for the affiliate commission.

    In two cases, I've actually seen merchants invite their affiliates to exploit an idea, and then when no affiliates followed up, the merchant has allocated staff time and resources to create the affiliate site -- with the affiliate commissions used to pay for the costs of creating and maintaining the site. Again, this wouldn't be proper if the "affiliate site" is something that is ordinarily part of the merchant's own site.

    I've worked for several companies as a consultant, and then after they've transitioned to in-house staff, I sometimes do "affiliate-role work" for the company, creating sites or running PPC campaigns, in exchange for affiliate commissions. As an affiliate, I've certainly created "doorway sites" that funnel traffic to a merchant (obviously this is much less effective since Google has paid attention to "affiliate bridge pages"), and since my name is in the WHOIS record, someone who knew I'd done consulting for the firm might assume that this was actually "owned" by the merchant.

    I also believe that it's fair and proper for a merchant to use "its own" affiliate links in their own PPC campaigns, or to otherwise supersede a prior affiliate cookie if a consumer must be "repurchased" via PPC or another method.

  13. #13
    OPM and Moderator Chuck Hamrick's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 5th, 2005
    Park City Utah
    I did doorway pages in 1999 and 2000 but Google frowned on them so we stopped it. That was several jobs ago. I have seen a number of companies use affiliate links with DO NOT PAY to track internal campaigns. Just a cheap tracking system. You can always question them.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    May 23rd, 2005
    I consulted for a company that used their affiliate network for all their tracking simply because thats all they knew to do. I know they did not do it to avoid paying commissions because they are very honest people with a lot of business sense. If they thought it would hurt their affiliate program/good name they would stop immediately. Also the company had to stick to certain rules because of the venture capitalists that gave them the investment money to startup.

    I think what it boils down to is whether or not the intention is bad/malicious in nature and if they are abiding by the network terms of use. If they are not breaking the rules but hurting their affiliates the market will adjust acordingly when affiliates drop their links. Also if its that common of a problem I think the networks should step in and impose restrictions on in-house use of tracking via network links.

    Just my $.02

  15. Newsletter Signup

+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. Expired Merchants / Removed Merchants Links~
    By Georgie Peri in forum GoldenCAN
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: August 13th, 2009, 11:18 PM
  2. CJ merchants scewing other CJ merchants affiliates as well as their own
    By Chief_Beef in forum Commission Junction - CJ
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: February 25th, 2004, 04:06 PM
  3. Trusted merchants/parasite free merchants
    By Steveinid in forum Merchants opposed to ParasiteWare
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: December 7th, 2003, 11:16 AM
  4. Are there any clean flower merchants or regular size evening gown merchants
    By womanht in forum Merchants opposed to ParasiteWare
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: January 16th, 2003, 02:01 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts